Was this for real or not...what do you think?

[PR Design]

Originally Posted by johnnysevengun

Fake. Someone's been watching too many movies.
It's the 'sleight of hand' job, your too distracted by the split screen and the poor quality that your mind is looking elsewhere.

A much better better job was the whole '68 "Moon Landing"

Is the '68 in reference to the fact that it was pre-recorded then released in '69?

A few issues here. One, there's no such thing as ghosts, which is a pretty conclusive argument, so end of. Even disregarding the former, WTF is an old lady ghost doing lurking in a 21st Century lift?

[jamilla]

creepy huh..FAKE..

[johnnysevengun]

Originally Posted by StiligeCecilie

Rofl! That's a good one. It wouldn't surprise me if someone told me it was fake. I've read the conspiracies... ;)

This was a great piece of communication ( whether right or wrong) they manipulated technology (albiet poor technology) to deceive us into believing what we saw. Unless 1960's USA had developed a way of creating a duplicate Sun and second light source on The Moon, and wind in a gravity free atmosphere - its all a studio set. Rent Capricorn One to see how close to the truth we are.

[johnnysevengun]

Originally Posted by PR Design

Is the '68 in reference to the fact that it was pre-recorded then released in '69?

Many peoples view is that this was filmed in Nov 68, some people think evem Stanley Kubrick was involve in the actual filming.

Some facts:

1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.

2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?

3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?

4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.

5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.

6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?

7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?

9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired.

Nuff said

[PR Design]

Yeah, they're all really compelling arguments. I love a conspiracy!

[MeganS]

The wikipedia article answers a lot of those arguments:
Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[StiligeCecilie]

Originally Posted by johnnysevengun

This was a great piece of communication ( whether right or wrong) they manipulated technology (albiet poor technology) to deceive us into believing what we saw. Unless 1960's USA had developed a way of creating a duplicate Sun and second light source on The Moon, and wind in a gravity free atmosphere - its all a studio set. Rent Capricorn One to see how close to the truth we are.

I saw a tv-show about this, one argumenting FOR and one AGAINST. So there is always an argument against everything :) So I can't say that that tv-show made me decide about this issue :P

[rossable]

Originally Posted by PR Design

Yeah, they're all really compelling arguments. I love a conspiracy!

eat your heart out!
The Black Vault

[PR Design]