Website/work opinion

please comment/discuss/approve/disapprove/suggest/digest

http://www.attentionto.co.uk

thanks.

[Kelly Creative]

I like your work but I'm not too keen on the site. Not a fan of flash but if it's used it needs to do something boardering on the spectacular. It seems rather boring and could easily have been achieved in a non flash way. Sorry

[Carrotnapper]

brutal but so true

[Bassoonjedi]

The flash viewer loads slow on my end, and I'm not too sure of what I'm looking at. try and reduce the load times by reducing the file sizes of your slides, and include some meta data on each slide. The metadata should provide a good explanation of the concepts, and also help the worms crawling the net gather data, and help your Google rank.

It's a clean deisgn, and it gives me an impression of a NY museum. Very nice gallery.

[monsta]

From an SEO point of view you should consider producing an (x)HTML version of the site, you could get some javascript to detect the flash and if found then load a style sheet which hides the text making way for the flash....

I like the look, are you going to use that blue area to the left for anything? If not maybe loose that and have it centered on the page?

[gospastic]

Oh dear Paul - back to the drawing board in so many ways. This site does not show off you work very well at all - which I imagine is the whole point...? You need to get the whole thing more centered to start with, use the space you have better, the navigation is pants, the images are not great - some shots are so bad they miss the subject - and if you did this on purpose then I am sorry but it does not work.

On the upside, you have got some really nice work in there somewhere, you need to display it better, that's all.

[docsharp]

It's not working for me, I only see paper on the front page.

[ianm]

the site doesn't do anything for me at all - possibly you need to make the navigation more clear, as it took me a while to spot the arrow on the first page