There is an alternative, whether the charity is huge or small.
You can ask for a rundown of how
effective a charity is as your payment.
Let's take a (really well known) charity helping out victims of a tsunami. They were very "efficient" in delivering several thousand polar coats to the tropical country. They had the coats on hand, they shipped them -- efficient.
Efficient, but not effective. This is one, very small story, and very common when people donate blindly because the cause makes 'em feel good.
Taking your pay for very simple, easily obtained performance data will open your eyes. Some employees will react like you just slapped them in the face.
Reading up on what nonprofits actually do with the donations people make (just because they think the money is going to be spent well) is a real eye opener. And these are the name brand institutions. But that's what you're helping to promote with the free logos, ads, and designer services you're chucking at them with no strings attached.
Get this straight. A nonprofit is not a cause. Never confuse a nonprofit with the cause they drape over themselves
to keep you from looking at the nonprofit operations.
Want to change the world with your design business? This is the way to end some very unpleasant practices.
Useless tsunami aid includes thong panties ...Sri Lankans also have no use for winter jackets, stiletto heels This doesn't phase me. I've encountered nonprofits and met some of the higher ups, so I understand how things work.
BTW, I've also volunteered my time to direct administration of charity. It's a better gig.
What makes me puke is people who wear their hearts on their sleeve and wear it like a knockoff Gucci because it makes themselves feel good. There must be a special place in hades reserved.
What’s Efficiency, Anyway? This is about nonprofit efficiency versus effectiveness. Question: What happens to the cushy salaries if the cause is properly and effectively addressed by the nonprofit?
Bookmarks