Strangely enough, this is the exact topic of
my post just days ago. You'll want to check my second link "The Real Web 2.0 Bubble".
In other words, good PhotoShop ...as a logo design perhaps not so much.
I see the P repeated between the image and logotype. However, otherwise there is too much distance between image and test, and not really that much similarity.
Finally, most of these bubble logos signify something. If the reasoning was that Adobe products were all going social, then maybe. But the bubble logos often are indicative of something with, at minimum, a comment function. To use another example, the arrow in the FedEx logo indicates movement and goes along with the idea you're shipping something somewhere. In other words, the logo has some common sense link to some idea the company is trying to get across.
I don't get a sense of some idea trying to be communicated, I see a pretty special effect. The logo creator is trying to be an artist, not a communicator. The result is a PhotoShop effect that doesn't symbolize anything the way a good logo design can.
As in the topic of the post I linked, Adobe products way too often put the user in a contextual vacuum, without feedback. Consequently logo design in general is more the symbol of anti-social behavior, making the speech bubble ironic rather than symbolic.
Related:
Kevin Airgid Uncovers a Web Design Trend:
Monkey See Monkey Do
While it can certainly be argued "monkey-see, monkey-do" is social, it's probably a little too one sided and unimaginative to be included as the pinnacle of human social interaction.