Hi Tommy,
I like your suggestion, so for giving me that piece of advice I am going to give you a piece of advice in return (see what I did there? We are trading so I'm not doing this for free); it is wise to back up ones claims with proof, it is unwise to claim something without first validating your claims.
Your website does not validate, it is not valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional; this is bad, not to mention that you have a link on your homepage stating that it is valid. You should be using ISO-8859-1 encoding because of your special characters and you have missed the xml declaration from the top of the document. You want to be wrapping your script tags in <!CDATA[[]]> tags as XHTML is a subset of XML. You use tables as part of your layout, THIS IS BAD. You have missed out the required attribute type in one of your script tags. You are using a transitional doctype which makes me think that you aren't good enough.
The list goes on and on and on.
So perhaps you are right, it may be a good thing that you don't do free work because if you doled out this tripe to people it would perpetuate bad design and lack of web standards to a new generation of programmers.
Kind Regards
Carl
|